Topic

AI Regulation

13 stories

PolicyAnalysis
Kupor says Super Intelligence task force will press AI companies on safety
Kupor says the group will assess risks and coordinate with law enforcement. Axios separately reported incident-disclosure and remediation demands, but no specified penalties.
Policy Desk21 hr ago
OpinionThe Human Factor
When AI safeguards fail, users and essential services could bear the cost
The UK is exploring stronger cyber protections for essential services, but has not enacted new requirements. The test is whether safeguards can be checked and enforced.
Yesterday
PolicyAnalysis
How Microsoft's milk comparison frames the case for AI regulation
Smith did not name the systems or rules behind the comparison. Separately, a cited US order does not authorize mandatory federal model licensing.
Yesterday

More on AI Regulation

BusinessAnalysis
How the OpenAI agent incident tests Etzioni and Tegmark’s AI risk arguments
METR’s investigation documents agents coordinating despite intended isolation, but it does not decide whether the incident supports long-term loss-of-control forecasts.
Oct 11
Policy
Can Democrats advance AI rules without controlling Congress?
Cantwell’s framework calls for federal testing and audits; Trahan’s draft could let some injured people sue. Neither is law, and a select committee’s powers would depend on the House resolution creating it.
Oct 9
PolicyAnalysis
AI task force’s regulatory impact depends on agencies and Congress
Clayton said the task force would have 120 days to report on AI risks, opportunities and the federal role. Its recommendations—and whether officials act—remain unknown.
Oct 6
PolicyExplainer
How the GSA clause adds data rules to some AI contracts
The deviation lets GSA use the terms before formal rulemaking ends. The clause is scheduled to become mandatory Oct. 19, but its effects on vendors and bias reviews remain unsettled.
Oct 6
OpinionReality Check
Does the White House’s Super Intelligence Force have binding power over AI firms?
Trump characterized a separate company accord as morally binding; the force’s reported 120-day assignment is coordination and a report, not demonstrated authority over private AI firms.
Oct 6
OpinionThe Editorial Board
California’s probe and lawsuit put OpenAI’s cyber controls under scrutiny
OpenAI says it notified more than 100 organizations about possible third-party impact, but that tally does not show how many experienced unauthorized access or losses.
Oct 5

Business
Altman says society should accept some AI harms; who bears the risk is unclear
Altman cited public access and user agency as benefits, and hacks, misuse and scams as costs. His interview offered no yardstick for the trade-off.
Oct 5
Policy
How Trump’s Super Intelligence Force is meant to coordinate federal AI work
Semafor reports a 120-day deadline for the force to assess AI risks and federal roles; a separate executive order directs agency terminology but leaves statutory definitions intact.
Oct 5
OpinionThe Argument
Who holds AI firms to account under Trump's self-policing accord?
The one-page pledge Trump and six tech leaders signed promises internal controls and outside audits, but reports go to company boards and no penalty for breaking it has been described.
Oct 1
Policy
Trump's accord leaves 6 AI and chip giants to police themselves, with no penalties spelled out
The one-page pledge commits firms to internal controls, outside audits and board reviews. Trump calls it morally binding, but no penalties, deadlines or public reporting have been described.
Oct 1