The Editorial Board

The considered view of the publication on the AI questions that matter most.

14 pieces

The Editorial Board is an opinion column from AI News. Its pieces argue a point of view. Follow the sources listed with each piece to explore the reporting behind the argument. Editorial standards

Two unbranded computing racks represent the AI-development systems whose status at Sasovo is unknown.

OpinionThe Editorial Board

AI providers should disclose how workloads survive data-center outages

Three Yandex sites were reported damaged or shut down after drone incidents, while the status of two AI-development supercomputers at Sasovo remains unknown.

Yesterday3 min read

Opinion: The Editorial Board
AI risks belong in US-China policy, but Campbell’s interview is not consensus
AP has reported a US proposal for incident notifications with China; Quad statements and projects do not establish a shared AI-risk framework.
Oct 11
Opinion: The Editorial Board
Google's Gemini agent must prove it can finish work reliably
Google describes cross-app automation and enterprise controls, but the launch provides no independent task-completion results or evidence of effects on workers.
Oct 9
Opinion: The Editorial Board
A model’s label is no substitute for independent results
Artificial Analysis scored the preview 38, behind five Chinese open models; on a separate cybersecurity evaluation, Large 4 outscored two rivals. Its weights were still pending.
Oct 9
Opinion: The Editorial Board
OpenAI should commission an independent review of its safety researchers’ dismissals
The researchers warn of a chilling effect, but the available record does not show whether current employees have changed how they raise concerns or work with outside evaluators.
Oct 9

More from The Editorial Board

OpinionThe Editorial Board
Interactive ChatGPT answers should be judged by whether users finish tasks
OpenAI says the interface can tailor answers with charts, forms and other controls. Whether those formats improve accuracy, understanding or task completion has not been independently established.
Oct 8
OpinionThe Editorial Board
Haiku 5.5’s lower listed rates need independent task tests
Haiku 5.5 starts at $0.10 per million input tokens for prompts up to 100,000 tokens, but published rates and company estimates do not show cost or quality on a buyer’s workload.
Oct 7
OpinionThe Editorial Board
HPE's Gen13 servers need workload evidence before buyers can judge their value
The four systems have distinct CPU, GPU and cooling designs, but their announced specifications do not show how they perform on customer workloads.
Oct 7
OpinionThe Editorial Board
OpenAI publishes 722 mathematics manuscripts as verification varies
OpenAI says the 722 manuscripts have different verification statuses; an independent advisory group says its role is not endorsement and community evaluation is still needed.
Oct 7
OpinionThe Editorial Board
EmbeddingGemma 2 broadens search options, but retrieval quality still needs proof
The weights are available under Apache 2.0, but Google’s benchmark scores have not been confirmed by a broad independent evaluation.
Oct 6
OpinionThe Editorial Board
California’s probe and lawsuit put OpenAI’s cyber controls under scrutiny
OpenAI says it notified more than 100 organizations about possible third-party impact, but that tally does not show how many experienced unauthorized access or losses.
Oct 5

OpinionThe Editorial Board
Selected defenders get Gemini 4 Argon first. Wider access needs evidence
Google already outlines Fairwind’s access controls, but questions remain about enforcement. Its reported Argon tests do not show whether defenders can turn model output into effective repairs.
Oct 3
OpinionThe Editorial Board
Open-source Huawei tools need real-world use to loosen Nvidia’s hold
The Ascend 950 software is available, but the evidence does not yet show whether outside developers can use it reliably enough to move workloads off Nvidia.
Oct 2
OpinionThe Editorial Board
A court dismissal is no answer to publishers’ AI search dilemma
The ruling rejected these antitrust complaints, not the possibility of lost publisher traffic. Congress should address publishers’ choice without treating alleged losses as proven.
Oct 2

Menu — AI News

The Editorial Board

AI providers should disclose how workloads survive data-center outages

AI risks belong in US-China policy, but Campbell’s interview is not consensus

Google's Gemini agent must prove it can finish work reliably

A model’s label is no substitute for independent results

OpenAI should commission an independent review of its safety researchers’ dismissals

More from The Editorial Board

Interactive ChatGPT answers should be judged by whether users finish tasks

Haiku 5.5’s lower listed rates need independent task tests

HPE's Gen13 servers need workload evidence before buyers can judge their value

OpenAI publishes 722 mathematics manuscripts as verification varies

EmbeddingGemma 2 broadens search options, but retrieval quality still needs proof

California’s probe and lawsuit put OpenAI’s cyber controls under scrutiny

Selected defenders get Gemini 4 Argon first. Wider access needs evidence

Open-source Huawei tools need real-world use to loosen Nvidia’s hold

A court dismissal is no answer to publishers’ AI search dilemma

The AI News Briefing